HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-11-67~~~ ~2 Council mins. contd. July 11, 196?
`~T~IIM GTTTR swimminn pool inasmuch as they are not x~.rFsently connected to the
ADVISED Or
CHARGE FOI' Towns sewer system. Mr. Rich was advised. that it is the policy
FIRST FTT I~
OP ?,LATER of the Town that the charge for sewer service is part of the water
charge and must be collected with that charge, and that Council could
not make exceptions to this policy.
Town Attorney Moore asked that the public hearing on a
AUG. 1st petition for the closing; of certain streets in the Route 99 property
SFT FO T' HF; ~ R? NC
OI~T CTnrIN'? OI' be continued until the August first meeting of Council, and to
ST . OTd RT . 99
consider the closinS of certain streets 1_ying north and south of the
Route 99 property, vrhich have never been opened and which the General
Chemical Company now asks be closed in consideration of the fifty-
foot right-of-way granted the Town by the Chemical Company for the
purpose of operning a street on and across their property. On motion
of Councilman GallimoNP, seconded by Councilman Aust, and. carried,
it was, RESOLjrFD, that the public hoarin~- Scheduled for this date
on the closin~^ of streets in the Roue 99 z~rooerty, be continued
until the Aumrst 1, 1967 meeting of Council.
On motion of Counci]snan Egnert, and seconded by Council-
man Cummings, and carried, it was, RESOLVED, that the fol]owinC
resolution be adopted:
T?~'SOLTT"'ION
G1HEpEAS, a r~ctition and application for the closinn of
certain streets, avPnu~s and ~al]eys was filed with the To~:rn of
Pulaski, Virginia, by Miller A. Bushon~•, Jr. and Charles Lei
Bushonr on the 21st day of March, 1967, said streets, avenues
and alleys being located north of Route "99 and w9.thin the
boundary line of the property recently purchased by petitioners
from said Tom, together with that part. of Kimball venue lying
north of Route lE99 and that part of Fourth Street lyin? between
thF old corporate limits off' said ToTrrn and Kimball .Avenue; and,
WHEP,EAS, a public hearing was had upon the said petition
on the 18th day of April, 1967, after proper notice thereof was
given; said public hearing; was continued_ from time to time and, is
still upon the agenda of said Town Council; and,
GIHFp~'A~', ePrtain ob:iectionc have been made by adjacent
landowners to thy; closing; of the streets, avenues and alleys
requested. without providing access to their property; and,
'rIHET?EAS, negotiations and conferences have been held with
the General Chemical Company which owns the land lying east of
Kimball Avenue and north of newly located Route #99, and south
of the Electro-Plastics and Davie lend; and,
T~IHT':R.EAS, said Chemical Comr_any has anreed to ~ivP a new
.fifty-foot right of way for the purpose of a street on and across
their property at a location designated. by it, which location is
at or near the present Bohannon Avenue as shown on the Pulaski
Council mins, contd. July 11, 1967
Development Company map and lying north of Route l#99; and an
additional 25-foot right of way adjacen~` to its northern boundary
1_inP any? +•hP southcrr_ boundary lino o~' th,~ Davis and Eloctro-
Plastics properties which would be an extension of East Street
from its present terminus to a point to intersect with the new
proposed right of way given by General Chemical Company; and,
?~IHEREAS, the Chemical Company has, in consideration of
its donating the aforemr'ntionPd right of way, requested that
other streets, avenues and alleys lyin~° north of the present,
location of Route ~{99 and south of the Davis and Electro-Plastics
land, and south of the boundary line of East Street and_ to the
eastern boundary line of the Chemical Company, said streets to
be closed beinm those portions of Kimball Avenue, Bohannon
Avenue, commonweal±h Avenue, Madill Avenue, Bride Street,
Fourth Street Past of Kimbal_1_ Avenue, ar.~? that part of Third
Street replaced by the location of Route {#99, and alleys within
said Blocks No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 18, as shown
on the aforementioned map, all of which have not heretofore been
opened and which lie north of the present location of Route X99,
be no~~~ offici~.lly abandoned and vacated; any?
~~'HEREAS, the Town believes that the request is a fair
on-' and will be advantageous to all. parties concerned;
NO?•d, THEREFO?'E, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
TOG!N OF PiTLASKI, VIRGINIA, meeting in regular session on this
11th day of July, 1967, that:
(1) The Attorney for said ToT.-n post a notice as
required by Section 15.1-364 of the Code of Virginia of 1950.
as amt~nded., advising that the Totrn will., on the 1st day of
^u~ust, 1967, further consider the said application for closinn
and vacating said street, and will appoint vie~rers at that time
and set a date for a public hearing on said closing.
(2! Take any further steps necessary to bring this
matter. properly before the Council for its consideration.
ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 1':,67.
TO?^In? nr PUL A SKT , VIRGINI A
BY ~~ C,_ V . J.4CK_SON ~.
Mayor ~- ____
Attest:
_„~~f:ladys R. Dalton _
Clerk of Council
The matter of a draft for a new brochure for the Town
rr^?a BRnr~TTr~r., of. Pulaski brought to the att,ent.ior. of r,ouncil by M-^. Hillsman,
Fn-~ TOr,~ra ~~v
r • r, • ~nnT~' ~n Director of the Public Chamber of Comm^rce, was to bP carried
on the agenda for Council's next meetin~.
Town Manar~Pr Morton presented a letter from the Norfolk
and ?.restern Railway Company in which it was requested that a portion
D~,FTInp~Tr,F of the 2.87 acres covered by a lease agreement dated May 1, 1965
A pr- TTnTr nr
P?• R` t''• ?'~'n~'• to the Town for beautification purposes and located near the
Pailway Station on nora Highway, be deleted from this agreement, as
+hi.~- portion had. recen#,ly been lAased to an industry, The area
to be deleted was located on a map which accompanied the request.
-~~~a~
'~.~# ~`} Council mins. contd. July 11, 1967
It wa.s brought out that the portion in question is what was known
as the stock pen site. Council. was agreeable to this request and
the letter and man were filed in the office of the Town Mana~?er.
A petition signed by three persons insi~3e the corpoY~ate
RF'~a, r0 t,tnTFR. limits and four outside the limits for water and sewer services to
nn? SnTInER.h".N'~ Snider Lane, eras presented to Council by Town Manager Norton. On
motion of Councilman Aust, seconded by Councilman Farmer, and
carried, this petition wars turned over to the water and. seU.fer
committees for report to Council.
Petition and 1~TOt,ice of Application to the Council by
VIFt~!T~':FS A.n~. B. C. ?~Tamnler to close a portion of Campbell Drive in the Draper
PTTB. H%1~?'IN'
ACTG. 1st FO'': Mountain Estates, was presented to Council by Town Attorney Moore.
C A~'PBET,L I?R .
CLOrIT?G BY On motion of Councilman Gallimore, seconded by Councilman Rust,
R . C . ?aAPfI'L,LR
and. carried., the following resolution was adopted naming viewers
in this m?.tter arr~ settinc; a public hnarina for the 1st day of
nu~ust, 1967.
P'TITTON
IAT pE: STREET CT;OSTNG,
POF~TION OF C nMT'BELI, DRIV}~_
TO THE; Mr^.YOr n.rTI1 MEMBFT{S
OT' TFiE COLjP~CIT, OF THE'
T047N OT' PT~'LASKI, ~ITRGIP`IA:
The undersigned resp~etful.]y netitior:G the Counc7.1 of
the Town of Pulaski, Virginia, to close that certain portion of
Campbell Drive ljjing and. being in the Draper Mountain Estates
and more particularly described as follows:
That portion of Campbell Drive lying immediately
east of the portion closed by ordinances enacted
by the `town of Pu1_aski, Virgir•ia, in June 6, 1967,
and east of Tot No. 1 i.n Section 2 of Draper
Mountain Estates, and bei_n~ 5a.4 feet in width
and extend.inr hetween parallel lines 200 feet
east of the aforementioned section closed by
the Town of Pulaski, ~.rir~inia; sand portion
being an additional 2~0 feet of Campbell T)rive
lying immediately east of and adjacent to the
portion closed;
And that all necessary steps and procedure, inoludin~ any notices,
appointment of viewers, etc., be had in this matter and that unon_
completion of. all tT~e reouired steps, that the Council by ordinance
¢rant the abandonment and. closing of said Campbell. Drive and. release
any and all claims thereto to the adjacent property o~•~ners or
to such of them and in the proportion. that they, the property
owners, are entit]_pd to by law or may further agree upon.
Your petitioner further attaches a copy of a notice which
he posted on the ]_st day of July, 1967, in three places within
the Town; the date of posting was t!;n (1~~ d^ys prior to the filinr~
of this petition ti•rith said Council.
That the costs of this procedure be taxed against the
pet3.tionc~r.
Given under my hand this 1st da~* of July, 1`?67.
1s~ . C . G.lampler
Council mins. contd. July 11, 196.
I~TOTICE OF n.PFL ICA.TION '?'O TH1a'. COTTNCIL
n~ THr T~?''N nr PITT. ^ cuT , 'TIRrTNI A. , T~"~ CL~')SE
P!1?'TTOI`` n^ C~MPBFT,T DPTUF IAT THE
DRA.j'r'?' MOTTR?TA ITT r~TgTFC ~ IA1 THE TO'.~?I\T n?'
pITL~ n CxI , VT"GTNT "'
TAKF D?OTICE that the undersigned, by petition, a copy
of which is attached hereto, intends to present, on the 11th
day of July, 1967, or as soon thereafter as he may ~~e heard, to
the Mayor. and the Council of the To~f~n of Pulaski his petition
reau~stin~ that the Council vacate and clo~-e that portion of
Campbell Drive lying immediately east of the section recently
closed by the Town of Pulaski in the Draper Mountain Estates,
which bortion of said. Camx~bP11 Drive is described as follows:
That oortion of C~:mpbell nrivA lying immediately
east of the portion closed by ordinance enacted
by the To~,rn of Pulaski, j.Ti.r~i.nia, on <Tune 6, 1967,
and east of Lot T1o. 1 in Section 2 of Draper
Mountain Estates, and being 5~.4 feet in width
and extending between parallel lines 20O feet
east of the aforementioned section closed by the
Tour.*r. of P~z]aski, Virniria; sand portion being; an
additional 200 feet of Campbell Drive lyinC
immediately Past. of and adiacPnt to the portion
closed.
The petitioner owns the _land nn both sides of the
portion of street to bP closed.
CTiven un~?Pr my hand and posted this lst day of ,Tu.l~~,
1967, on the bul~`~tin board at the Pulaski ~'ounty Courthouse,
at the Municiapl Office of the Town, ar_d at the Pulaski Fire
Department located on the north side of Jefferson Avenue, all
in the Town of Pulaski, ?~irginia.
SEE RFSOL~UTIOAI - Page 4461
Tot~Jn M a.na~er rTnrt,on advised that an effort is being
mado t.n obtain an Ps~Pment from the General Chemical Company i.n
conne.etion with the Taylor-nillon Street Se*JTer line extension, and
that an estimate of the cost of the line had been furnished to
Council under Plan A in the sum of x'18,500.00, and Plan B in
the sum of x;'18,000.00, a..nd Plan C in the; sum of '34,869.82. No
action t.ra,^ n<~cess~rv at this ti-mP, pend.~ n~ the SF'cu;~i_n` or the
easement from th~~ Central Chemical Company.
t'11'~h renards to a request for ::;ewer servi^P to Drap~.r
Mouna.ai.n rstat~~^, To~.Tn Manager P?orton adv~ ~~s that t~~ro nroposaJ_s
are under stud~T at thi.~ t;_me, .^nr~ that more e1. -v~~ti.ons ,are beinn
t?1'r~h ~',(? ?Ff'nr't,a'i n. the best annroac~h ~'_n t;}~7.-- °v'n'1.
Rii7 Fairer, t.rho stated h: lit,*~~~? off ~omm~rne .Street in
? o+ti_::!r Bottom ad~Ti sPd Council. that ±,he~T had been tot"~? thev wou).'
b :. n:Xt 1n llnC fOr ~et,7r?r 1l_nC PXtE?nSlOn 8nta cnr~,rie',r? aft0'^ thy.
K(1'.-av.a `~t7'C'et ?nd r?,~-n Kri~f.., T~Orlr~ Ci;'ninrt' t~lr?~1-. q P,E3tJ_1,7.On rl~d bE.'C-'n
turned i.n to the Counci_1 i.n 1965 ^nd at least five rronerty owners
had paid. their connection fee to the to~.m. after a discussion of
the matter. , it tti~as supnested that this he Checked 2.nto i4.t~°ther to
-~: ~5
`~!~ ~~ Council. minx. contd. July 1.1, 1.967
sea ho*a many had pnicl th~ it cone^cti on fee and ho?,• man~T actually
wanted the service.
M.r. Cummin~-s advised that the ?~~a,ter Commi.tte~ had m~:?t and
considered the three z~~rnain~ nroj ,cts; ttiro n° t•rh9.ch fre outsde the
co~~•r~ora+•r limits and one inside. Mr. Cummin~c stated it was th,:~
recommondation o_° the Committee that, thr .recently adont.ed oz•dinance
establishin:- th. policy of th<- To,,,n concernin~* sunnlvi.nr= taater
to u~er.s ou+side the corporate limits of th~~ Tosco rrevail i.n the
request of Twin Oaks property o~•*ners for water service as well.
as the Fou';e 611 request for water service. tIe further stated.
it was the recommendation of the committoo that inasmuch as the
cost of thr Smith Lane water tin- extenson Trrhich was mode by
James McMill_~n w^:^ r,-:~ohibiti-r~ becauc~ i+ won 1.' only sP?-ve on~~
broperty o~~~n^r, end that he be advised that until. the neighborhood
built un. the Town coul_,a not Pxtor? this l.ins at an estimated cost
o" ?'l. ^nr1,n{~ for just oar house.
On motion of Councilman Frye, seconded by Councilman
Far*ner, and. carried, it was, ???a:SOI,~,IrD, that the action and recom-
mcndation of the ?.rater Committee relative to the Twin Oaks request
for ,rater service be approved.
On motion of Councilman Fry~_, seconded by Councilmaan
E~~*ert, and earric?d, i1; eras, RFSOI_~VF.D, that the action and recommend-
a+,ion of the water committA~ relative to the Motel site on RoutA 99
be annrovrd .
On moL:i.on of Councilman Frye, r~conded b~~ !'rnzrni loran
NOT FEASII3I_,E F~~ert, and carried, it ~,ras, ??FrnT, *ril, that the recommen~??.tion off'
TO SUPPLY S?~I7TH
L.'!NI: PE~~TT??ST th ~ Grater committee that it is no' feanibl_~ to 1~~v a 2" line at the
F0 T.TnmFH .
rresont time to Smith Lane area at the cost of ~1~00.00 for one
house, be adopted.
Councilman ]?rye reported that the Cemetery Committee met
MFG. ST~iATTrT on June 27th and reviewed the initial proposal of Mr. Hal :Swann,
RFccor~r~ns
OA!7Y 5 n.CRF,S who had been worki_nr~ nn the Development Plan for Oakwood Cemetery,
BE D~TELOPr'n
and i.t was N1r, Swarm's recommendation that only five of the 18
acres o" lard be devel.oprd at this t,imr. His oronosal included
develanmont o~' five acres in the Southwest corner of the n^w
cemetery land, with a nrw entrance to the cemetery from Hayhurst
Avenue and. tie in with the present drive, a distance of approx-
imately 350 feet. The Committee recommended, and Mr. Frye so
-~~1 ~"~
Council mins. contd.. July ll, 19&7
moved. that Mr. Swann be authori~Pd to p~•epare a dPtail~~d layout o`'
±ho first five acre tract develonm~n' . This mot9_on was seconded by
Cnunni.lmnn CZZmminns, end carri::d.
Mr. F~?~*ert renort~d that at a p-••ior meetira frith the
Pt~l nski Merchants Council it. way- dncide~ that Peak Creak shoul?
b~ rqV°.rP,d for a n^rkin ~?~ck and in orr?er to do this it would
r~ necessar~~ to determi-n~ the owner.shib of the creek; that an
out-of-town attorney had been contacted re{~ardincr this, who indicated
his fee would be anywhere from ~~5,OOO.C~? to ~=7,5nn,nC~ Mr. F~~ert
Mrl?Ci). COTTI~?CTI, stated further that a firm commitment had nova been made by thn
^GRFF~ T~) P^X
5C~ CF COSTS Merchants Council, and this litter tras read to Counoil in which the
Tn CT FAT" TTTT,:-
T~ p~nu~ CPFEK Merchants Council_ a~rPed to pay fifth percent or the costs - up to
~~?r~C.CC, to clear the title to Peak Creek so a parkin• deck could
be built. Mr. F~~ert so moved that Mr. Moore, the Town Attorney,
disqualify himself because of his relationship with his son, who
claims to be a part-owner to the Creek, and. that the Town of Pulaski
then employ and outside attorney, subject to the approval of Council,
to institute proper lc~a1. nrnceedinrs to determines the o~:•n~~rship of
th^ Creek and that the cos+.,^ o? the nrooeed^_n~s u.n to ~'7500.OC! be
r~:id _for by the To~~m. and ar,nropriated from the General- Fiznd.
Considerable discussion fo11o1•red re~^ard.inn 1e~a1 asp~~ets o_° the
m~~+.+,Pr, and Councilmman Frye offered a substitute motion, as fol-Lows:
That the To~•rn of Pulaski employ an att.,o,•ney to assist ?nd advise
them on the otirnorship o.f Peak Creek and ±.o assist in a:equirin:.~ the
title thereto, and that the amount, of ~'7~.nn.nn be .appropriated from
the Genc;ral Fund for thi.~ purpose. Thi~• motion Baas seconded by
Councilman Aust, and carried on the follo?ainn vote:
t~J. S. Cummins - ay° Pudolnh Farmr,r - qve
Glen K. Aizst _ av~ C,. B. Crallimore -aye
S. G. Frye - qve R.avmona F. Ratelif f - absen•'.,
H. H. Fg~ert - ayr T. J. McCarthy -absent
At the direction o-~' Council, Town Attorney Moore had
prepared, and so read to Council, a resolution concerning a proposal
r-~~c. Fx'nA4 fr. om Town Manager Pdorton for a ten-year pro#ram of Capital Improvements,
Tnr,iT~ Tf(;~?,
FO:.:~ together with a s~ia~ested plan for financing same-, and on motion of
TF1~?-Y_: " p
C^P. TT~'P~?CV- Councilman Gallimol P, seconded by round 1m^n F~~Prt, and carried, the
follo~ain~- resolution was adopted :
~~ ~~ Council minx. contd. July 11, 1967
RFSOT.,UmION
titi~HEREAS, the Council of the Totrm of Pulaski, Virginia,
has received. from the ToTJ*n Manager a proposal .for a ten-year program
of Capital Improvements, together with a suggested plzn for financ-
ing an alternate plan con~~.emplating the approval of a Rond Issue;
anal,
?~TI-LT'R.EAS, the Council, after due consideration believes
th proposal to bo a necessary and nron~r approach for t,hQ efficient
and orderly developm_ n'-, o" the necessary capital improvemc,nt for thc;
Tom over the next severalycars;
NO!d, THrREFOT'E, BE IT RES''~LVED T3Y TTp~; COUNCIL, OF T~-L
TOG7N Or PUL.!~STtI, ~TIGInTI^., meeting in regular. session on this
11th dap of July, 1967, that:
(11 Thc~ report and. proposal berece:ived anal filed as a
pert of the proposed. financial and capital development program off'
the To~•m and. m^do by reference a part of th~„ minutes of thin meeting.
(2~ ThE~ report, be, and the same is hereby, ratified and
approved, and the Town Manager and such other person as he may
designate are directed to proceed with preliminary plans for the
projects, subject to the Council giving from time to time its
approval, which app~•oval must be obtaa.ned before any commitment
for pa:,ym^n+ o°• ou•"lay of funds is made.
(3) The Tot•~n Manager is further directed to advise
Council at least every sixty (6O~days of the status of various
phases of thr~ pro~~ram deve_lopmen+, and the Tot~zn Manager sha11 not
p-oceed farther nn any nhase~until approval. of Council is given
to each step as presented and direction for the continuance
thereof is authorized.
ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 1967.
TO`'RT Or' PtTL ^.ST'I , VIRGIATIA
Tay ,1sL C. V. Jackson _
Mavor
Attest:
_ ~ Gladys R.. Dalton
Ohrk of Council
In discussion further the request of the Pulaski Cable TV
COA^~NI< APP. TO System for permission to increase its rates, Town Attorney Moore
ST?Tny IrTCRFASF
IrT RnTES I3Y advised that it was his opinion that Section 14 of the TV Ordinance
PU. C~BT,'~' TV
determines the method by which rates may be increased. This section
provided that all rates cha,_rged by the company for service shall be
fair and reasonable and "designed to moot necessary costs of the
service, etc.": and. therefore the Council has a ri~-ht to determine
what rates are fair and reasonable and desamned to meet the n^cessary
costs of the service. He stated further that it was his opinion the
company should submit receipts and cost figures and show their
business practice in order to establish a need for a rate increase,
and, secondlST, that they are conducting their business under an
Council mins. contd. July 11, 1967
-~~ ~c)
efficient and economical managemen"; the+, the Council coup de,siT*nate
an appropriate committee from the Counca.l. t,o h~;ar evidence of the
company for increasintT the rates, and then act on it. Councilman
Frye moved that the matter be referred to the ord.znance committee
which motion was seconded by Councilman Gallimore, and. carried.
On motion of Councilman Eggert, seconded by Councilman
it
cH~~Tp-,^ p,~,. rS-
APT'!
Galla.more, and carried., the folJowinC r~sol.ution was adopted:
t1iHERE?c, the Virginia Departm~n'~. of Community Colleges
in a recent survey has established that a Community College should
be established in an area composed of the City of Radford, and the
Counties of Pulaski, Giles, Floyd, and r'ontgomery; and
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the Totirn Council of the Town
DtrgT,Tn? , inn ,
BFcT T nC~~TIO?`?
FOi? COM1~i,
CnT T,~ a're'
of Pulaski, Virginia, that a location made a_vailablo near thn Town
of DurJ_in, Virginia, best meets the qua~ificati_ons any' require-
menf:s set forth in the statute creatin~Y the Board and in the policies
of the Board as to the proper location of a Community College.
TvTO?:i, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of
1
P!zl~ski, Virginia, that it is their expressed desire and wish
that tho Virginia Department of Community Colleges do establish
a Communi':,y Co11e~e at the availa_bl.e location n`.'ar the Town of
Du',~lin, Vi°~ai pia.
Arlon+.Pd. this 11th data of July. 1967, at a regular meeting;
of the Town Council, Pulaski, Virginia,
TOZ•TN Or PLTL ^ SuI , VI?GINIA
By /s/ C. V. Jackson
Attest:
~,s1 Cxladys R. Dalton
Clerk of the Council
Mr. Bane reported on a trip that had been made with Mr.
R.F;POPT OI'?
5-YFAP *'ROG.
FO^ DEVI;T.,nP .
RFC . FAC::II~IT-
I~'S
T~'orton to Richmond to visit the Bureau n~' Outdoor Recreation to
discuss a program for the devPlopmen+, o•~ recreational .faci~..iti~s
for Pulaski. He was advised in Richmond that it was possible to
set up a 5-year program for stage development that could be jointly
finances; 25 o by the town, 25°o by the State and 5O ~ by the Federal
government. Mr. Bane r?quested permission to include the 1~dayside
at the l!rmory, the Mountain Parr: land and Gatewood r?eservoir in the
pl~.n, which was granted. Mr. Bane stated that the preparation of
•~~~~ Council m_ns, contd. Ju1,y 11, 1967
the plan was underway. Councilman Aust moved that "we go forward
with this pro~*ram", which motion was seconded by Councilman Gallimore,
and carried.
Councilman Fr. ye moved that the Recreation Commiss3.on work
with the Recreation IlepartmGn±. on this pro,^~ram, which motion was
secon~?ed by Counci_]man C,allimoa°e, and car.r~ed.
Th^ mattes of a letter from the Merchants Council concern-
ins assistance in the purchase of new Christmas linhts was placed
on the agenda for council's next meetinC.
On motion of Councilman Farmer, seconded by Councilman
ACCEPT T?ICaHT OF F~~ert, and carried, it. was, I?ESOI:VED, that the To?,rn acauire and
1tIAY FO''. SE?~1ER
L~INL' TO VIA?E Rc acdep+, as a gift a fifty foo+, right-of-wav fo• a sewer lines to
PITTN^.CI.~ ST. _
Vinc zed Pinna.ele Streets, as offered by property o~•mers.
On motion of Councilman Farmer, seconded by Councilman
RET. FEE FOF Eggert, and carried, it was, RESOLVED, that the retainer fee for
TO?~mT ATT . INC .
TO x'100.00 per Town Attorney be increased to :'.100.00 per month.
MONTH
The meeting adjourned at 6:20 P. M.
APPROVFP:
Mayor.
!fittest
_~1~~
Cler of Council
1
1
Council mins. contd. July 11, 1967
RF.4nT,TTTT(1TT
BE IT RESCLVF~:D BY THE COTTNCIL OF T~iE TO?•:~I QF PUI.ASKI,
VI?'GITTIA, meeting in re2~u.lar session on the ~ lth day of July,
1967, as follo!as:
?•:rHEPFAS, a petition and anp7.in3tion for the closing of
a certas.n street h^s been filed with the Town of Pulaski, Virginia,
by B. C. ?dampl~r, in person, which street i.s described as follows:
That portion of Campbell Drive lyinn immediately
east of the portion cloyed by ordinance Pnact~d
by the Torn of Pulaski, Virniria, on Jung 6, 1967,
and east of I~ot Nn. 1 in ~~etion ? or nranc.r Mountain
Estates, anc~ heron ;4.4. f?+~t in !•ridth a.nd extend~.n-
between n^rall.~l lines 2.~0 feat east of the afore-
mentioned section c]_osed by the Town of PulasTci,
Virginia; said portion beinF~ an add~.tional 2C0
feet of Campbell Drive lying immediately east of
and adjacent to the portion closed;
any?,
?~'i?F,PF~~,, it aopears that nrOp~~r notice as required by
statute eras posted in at, l:~ast three places in the Town, including
the Courthouse; of the Circuit, Court of Pulaski County, Virginia,
nn the 1st day of July, 1967, and at least ten (hl days have
expired since the said postinn; and,
?^7HEREAS, the Council of said Town, ur~on viewing the
petition filed herein, finds it to be in proper order and directs
it to be received. and filed, and further directs that the viewers
hereinafter appointed, view the described street, and that all
other steps necessary be followed to brim this matter properly
before the Council for its final consideration; and,
TnTH~'REAS, said petitions=r has req_uPSted the Council to
^roint the necPSSary vie!aers and to take other steos to properly
determine this matter:
TTY?~r, THRREFOPE, BE IT ??.ESOT,VEn THAT:
(1) The application be, and the same is hereby, received
and filed..
(21 Viewers be appointed as follows:
1. W. M. Board
2. C . L . Plunkett
3. E. C. Grigsby
Alternate: G. C. Hall
(3) Such viewers shall meet ^nd renor+., in !•rritind !whether
in their opinion any, and if any, what, inconvenience would result
from the vacation and. closing of the street as requested in said
petition.
(a) That the Clerk of Council give written notice to all
land o~srners affected by any changes by closing of the street, and
further, that said Clerk o~' Council give public notice by T~ublica-
ti.on of same in the Sou'hlaPst Times, a local newspaper, once a
a week for two consecutive weeks, thepublic hearinr~ to be not less
than five (5) d~:.,ys nor. more Char. ten (1C`~ days after final publica-
tion; and that said notice describe the said street and set out
therm that the Town may vacate and close same, and that the 1st
da:y or Au^ust, 1867, be i~'xed as a date urzon which the said. Council
will hold a public hf_arinn upon Laid ma+,ter nendinry before it,
and that all persons interested may be hard either for or against
any or all of said. petition under consideration.
(51 That the said Torn Manager a.nd Attorney for said Town
do any and all n+h~r things n^cessary for the nrop~r determination
nr this muter.
!~T)OP'_"~n this 11th d?.y of July, 1~~67.
T~?•?~T CT' PTTI.A:?KI, VIRGTnTIA
Approved:
~~ C. V. Jackson
Attest:
Gladys R. Dalton
~'~~~~a1