Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-06-18Minutes of the Pulaski Town Council meeting held at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 6, 2018 in the Council Chambers of the Town Municipal Building at 42 First Street, N.W. In attendance were: Mayor: David L. Clark, presiding Councilmen Present: G. Tyler Clontz; Brooks R. Dawson; Gregory C. East; Joseph K. Goodman; Lane R. Penn; James A. Radcliffe Administration: Shawn M. Utt, Town Manager Nichole L. Hair, Deputy Town Manager Legal Counsel: Spencer A. Rygas, Town Attorney Press Melinda Williams, Southwest Times Staff Chief Robbie Kiser, P.F.D. Bill Pedigo, Town Engineer David Quesenberry, Clerk of Council Rebecca Reece, Finance Director Chief Gary Roche, P.P.D. Others Present: Nancy Burchett Al Davis Aphi Fancon Sharon Hardy Rich Meadows Laura Reece Danielle Reid James Ridpath Carol Smith Jim Stout Mary Stout Lisa Webb Rhonda Whitehurst 1. Call to Order Mayor Clark called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. & 3. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Dawson and the Invocation given by Councilman East. 4. Roll Call After the Invocation, the roll was taken. Present were Mayor Clark, Mr. Clontz, Mr. Dawson, Mr. East, Mr. Goodman, Mr. Penn and Mr. Radcliffe. Since all Council members were in attendance, a quorum of Council was present to conduct business. 5. Modification of the Agenda Mayor Clark asked for a motion to modify the agenda with the addition of Item 7b. "Presentations" for a proclamation for the World War I Centennial Remembrance and the addition of one matter under Item 14 "Closed Session" under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 7, consultation with legal counsel regarding actual or probable litigation regarding a zoning violation. The motion to modify the agenda was made by Mr. Goodman, seconded by Mr. East and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye 6. Recognition of Guests and Visitors Mayor Clark welcomed everyone in attendance and thanked them for coming out to the meeting. Page 1 of 9/November 6, 2018 Council then moved to the next item on the agenda concerning the 2019 American Evolution Celebration with speaker Carol Smith. 7. Presentations a. 2019 American Evolution Celebration, Carol Smith Mrs. Smith spoke to Council on behalf of the Pulaski County American Evolution 2019 Commemoration. The observance, officially sanctioned by the Commonwealth, was to celebrate 400 years of Virginia history and its impact upon the Commonwealth and the nation. Noting the rich historical heritage of Pulaski County, the Town of Pulaski, and the Town of Dublin, Mrs. Smith said the commemoration was to bring the historical heritage of the area to the public during the year of the commemoration. Partnering with the local committee for the observance was the larger state commemoration effort, local governments, local schools, local businesses, museums, groups and organizations. Additional promotional efforts included a presence at the Marketplace, placement of banners throughout the County, and events focused on the Radcliffe Museum and the Train Station. Themes for the commemoration were diversity, democracy and opportunity as they related to the citizens of the county. Mrs. Smith told Council that events were planned throughout the year with a special event promoted each month. In addition to providing a local perspective on events such as Women's History and Black History Month, the committee would also participate in events such as Radford University's Native American Festival. The signature event however, would be Thanksgiving 2019. Since it would not be possible for all residents to assemble together for a celebration, a special candle, created by Corona, was commissioned for distribution to households throughout the County in a spirit of thankfulness and unity. The debut for the candle would be at the Chamber Dinner on November 15" Information resources for the commemoration Mrs. Smith said, included a website, applications program and various handouts, such as Council received at the start of the presentation. Mrs. Smith said she looked forward to working with Council to make the celebration a success. She then concluded her remarks to Council. Mayor Clark and Council thanked Mrs. Smith for her presentation. Next item considered was the "Bells of Peace" commemoration of the World War I Armistice Centennial. b. Proclamation Bells of Peace -WWI Armistice Centennial Observance Mayor Clark referred to the proclamation concerning the "Bells of Peace" which was in honor of the ending of World War I at 11:00 a.m. on November 11, 1918, when bells tolled all over Europe to signal the end of the war. Mayor Clark said he would read the proclamation into the record and afterward present the signed document to representatives from the Commemoration Committee. He read the proclamation as follows: "In Recognition of Bells of Peace: A World War I Centennial Armistice Remembrance, Whereas, on behalf of the citizens of the Town of Pulaski, I am honored to offer this Proclamation encouraging citizens to remember the sacrifices of those who fought in World War l; and, Whereas, a century ago, 4.7 million American men and women served our nation and the world during the global conflict known as World War l; and Whereas, many men and women from Pulaski served selflessly and honorably in World War I. However there were 375, 000 American casualties including 116,516 deaths; and, Whereas, on the 11 h hour, of the 11"' day, of the 11 rn month, in 1918 an armistice to halt the fighting was declared and World War I ended; and, Whereas, the U. S. World War I Centennial Commission has called upon all Americans across the nation to honor and remember those who served in the conflict and ultimately gave their lives. Page 2 of 9/November 6, 2018 Now, Therefore, 1, David Clark, Mayor of the Town of Pulaski, do hereby call upon the citizens and institutions of our community to toll the bells 21 times in remembrance of the Armistice at 11:00 a.m. on November 11, 2018. " Following the reading of the proclamation, Mayor Clark signed the document and presented it to local representatives from the Pulaski County WWI and WWII Commemoration Committee. Accepting the proclamation from Mayor Clark were: Sharon Hardy, VFW Post 1184 Commander Jim Ridpath, Mary Catherine Stout, Nancy Burchett, Carol Smith, and VFW Vietnam veteran Al Davis. Following the presentation, Council considered the next agenda item, the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite. 8. Public Hearings a. Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Ms. Hair introduced Ms. Aphi Fancon of the New River Valley Regional Commission who had been working with the Planning Commission for the past year on a rewriting of the Zoning Ordinance. She said Ms. Fancon would update Council on the new zoning ordinance. Ms. Fancon briefed Council on the revisions to the zoning regulations. Referring to a memo in the Council packet, Ms. Fancon said the main goals of the revision were to: add more permitted uses; make the regulations more clear; reduce redundancies; and to minimize the need for interpretation. These changes would assist in removing barriers for new businesses, encourage redevelopment and infill development, and make the document more user friendly for the citizens. She then reviewed changes to the document which included: making the ordinance clearer; adding new permitted uses to compatible districts; moving some uses to another district where it was more appropriate; and placing development criteria into each zoning district's section. Additional revisions included several new sections on: general requirements; wireless communication facilities; amateur radio towers; a new residential district consolidating the current R3 and R4 residential districts; mobile home park districts and residential manufactured home subdivisions; new parking standards addressing joint use and landscaping; and a new sign chapter addressing the Supreme Court's ruling, new sign processes, and non -conforming signs. After this review, Ms. Fancon finished her presentation Mayor Clark asked for comments. Mr. Utt informed Council that this was a public hearing with no action expected from Council. Mr. East asked about requirements regarding handwritten signs (e.g. posterboard) in the new regulations. Ms. Fancon replied that the new requirements regulated signs by size, not by content regardless of it being a temporary or permanent sign. Mr. East asked if temporary was defined in the new regulations and was told that it was. Ms. Hair said she wanted to get the new zoning regulations adopted before beginning strong signage enforcement. In her interpretation she added, cardboard would not be considered a temporary sign. The type of sign material was defined in the definition of a temporary sign. Ms. Fancon added that there was a permitting process for temporary signs in the new regulations. Mr. Goodman asked concerning political signs. Ms. Fancon said the new regulations moved away from garage sale signs and political signs. Mr. Goodman noted that political signs were regulated by the state and asked if a permit was required for a political yard sign. Ms. Hair said they were not if it was on your personal property. However if the sign was over a size limit, a permit would be required. She continued that the state had a model ordinance dealing with political signs which the new regulations mirrored. Mr. Goodman asked if signs for defunct business would still be required to be removed. Ms. Hair replied that it was. He then asked about the provisions for amateur radio. Ms. Fancon responded that the state did not allow localities to regulate antennae under 75 feet in height. She added that shorter towers would require a permit for safety reasons so the inspector could make sure there were no hazards. Page 3 of 9/November 6, 2018 After discussion, Mayor Clark opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. There being no comment he closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. Council next moved to the Consent Agenda. 9. Public Comment Period No comments were received from the public. 10. Consent Agenda a. Consideration of the meeting minutes from October 2nd; October 9th; and October 30th, 2018 Mayor Clark asked for a motion to approve the minutes of the October 2, 2018 Council meeting; the October 9, 2018 called Council meeting; and the October 30, 2018 Council budget meeting. Mr. Goodman moved to adopt the October 2nd, October 9th and October 30th Council meeting minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Radcliff and approved by unanimous voice vote of Council. Following approval of the minutes, Council moved on to Project Updates. 11. Proiect Updates a. Project Summary Sheet Mr. Utt informed Council that the new Town website was now on-line. While recognizing there were still things to be worked out, Mr. Utt encouraged Council to look at the site and submit their ideas for content and changes. Mr. East asked about access. Ms. Hair responded that the intent was to have the homepage ready with content being placed into subpages and other subpages created. Mr. Utt called the homepage up and ran through various features on the home page menu. Mr. Dawson asked if there was a calendar of events. Ms. Hair said the main calendar was populated by multiple calendars such as the special events calendar and the Senior Center calendar. The final calendar was the main Town calendar for listing Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, Town office closings and similar items. Mr. East asked if there would be room for online forms in the future. Ms. Hair replied that staff had been working on that through the document center. Mr. Dawson asked who was responsible for the website. Mr. Utt replied Ms. Hair and Ms. Bivens would be. Ms. Hair said she had "one on one" training with the website trainer to enable her to assist employees with the site or place them in touch with the trainer. The goal she continued was to have each department able to edit content for its page as well as use other features. Mr. Dawson asked where information for the calendars could be sent. Ms. Hair said the information could be sent to her and that another community calendar was available through the Chamber of Commerce. Other organizations such as Pulaski on Main, the Chamber, and the County could be linked in to the website. She said that a decision would need to be made on how to populate the Main calendar with all the events or direct users to other organizations. Mr. Goodman asked if a business directory would be included in the site. Ms. Hair replied that she was not sure how that would look. Options were a listing of businesses, like Pulaski on Main had, or a map showing the location of the businesses. She requested to come back to Council with some options. Mr. East asked about a timeline for making corrections to the site recognizing that the site was an ongoing process. Ms. Hair said she would be in contact with the technician in Toronto by email. She felt issues would be addressed quickly and reminded Council that the news article mentioned that the site would be changing. Mr. Rygas suggested that everyone should look through the site on their own which might facilitate its review. The next highlight discussed was the skate park. Mr. East felt the term "target date" implied that the date would be missed. He felt it should a "hard" date. Mr. Utt suggested a term of deadline with an explanation why a task was not met. Page 4 of 9/November 6, 2018 Mr. Goodman asked about a statement on the drop site which said that the PSA had approved the Pulaski site over Fairlawn. Mr. Utt explained that the PSA had given the Pulaski site a higher priority. He cautioned that additional property was acquired for and some engineering done on the Fairlawn site. Mr. Utt noted that at the last PSA meeting there was general agreement among Board members that if the Pulaski site needed to be a priority it would be. Mr. Goodman asked Mr. Utt to relay his thanks to the PSA Board. Regarding Gatewood, Mr. Radcliffe suggested a meeting among the vendors, the Council, and park customers and see what issues needed correction. He suggested the meeting be held before the park's opening next season. Mr. Utt said he considered asking the vendors to a work session as a closed session item for issues the vendor had brought up. Mr. Dawson felt public participation was missing. Mr. Utt suggested a community meeting where the public could participate. Mr. Radcliffe said if there was anything the Town could do, it needed to be identified and done. There being no further questions and comments, Council moved to the update on the GCC Brownsfield Grant Project. 12. Old Business a. Update of GCC Brownfields Grant Project Mr. Utt reviewed the most recent cost estimate which eliminated duplicate costs of $130,000 and added updates. The Town had asked Draper Aden to review eligible expenditures from the grant of $240,000. The eligibility of the expenditures had changed due to the project's evolution from a growing space to a recreational area and skate park. Expenditures which remained eligible for using the grant funds included: removal of structure foundation and contaminated soils; seventy-five percent of the concrete cost of the basketball court; and grading around the hardscape construction area. Non -eligible expenditures included utility work related to the restrooms and lighting. Mr. Utt recommended getting rid of lighting altogether from Phase 1 because none of the other parks were lit and use of the facilities late at night or in the early morning might not be desirable. Since all parks currently close at dusk, he felt that the dusk closing time needed remain consistent at least at the beginning. Mr. Goodman did not agree and said the kids wanted something to do and this was a good central location. A short discussion ensued on how the park could be used for activities at later hours and whether or not different policies for basketball and skateboarding should be considered. Mr. Utt said a project that was affordable required $67,000 if it could be funded now. Mr. Goodman suggested using streetlights, as is done at Sixth Street Park to illuminate the areas for use. Mr. Utt responded that staff had looked at running lights like those at Jackson Park, down one block on First Street, which would allow some use of the space. With respect to stormwater management/storm sewer improvements, Mr. Utt noted these improvements were for drainage and were not a Sewer Fund expense. Moving back to a discussion of water meter/utility work, Mr. Utt said he had proposed originally using Town crews as with any other Town project with materials from the Water Fund and the Water crew to do the labor. Discussions with Mr. Dawson indicated his belief that perhaps it was not desirable at this point to co -mingle expenses when there was trouble doing Town projects to start with and then adding a recreation project. An opportunity might exist, he continued, to use one of the pre - constructed restrooms which only required water hook up. Constructing a rest room on site would prove to be a challenge which required a step back on the utility fund usage. Mr. Dawson said his concern was that water/sewer projects were discussed during the budget sessions that could not be completed because of time or staffing. Earlier this year, he continued rates were raised on water and sewer to raise money for those funds to become self-sustaining and for projects that needed to be done. Both of those conversations would be difficult to explain regarding a recreation park using resources from those two departments if there was other work that needed to be done. Mr. Utt said Mr. Dawson's point was valid. Mr. Utt said of the project taken as a whole, the largest impact to the General Fund was related to the skate park, because its location on the site was not impacted by ground contaminants. The consultants felt that most Page 5 of 9/November 6, 2018 of the skate park would not be eligible for EPA grant funds. This resulted in approximately $110,0004115,000 of expenses related to the skate park becoming ineligible for EPA grant funds. The skate park would remain eligible for the Department of Conservation & Recreation (DCR) grant and the Tony Hawk fund. However, according to officials at the state level, DCR grants awarded in April were not being honored by the National Park Service who supplied the funding. An application for these grants might not be started until Spring 2019. If Council desired to move forward, then it might do so being mindful that other sources of funds would have to be used. Mr. Utt said the total cost of the project would be $770,000 which would include approximately $100,000 in contingency funds and a potential for $336,000 in grant funds. This required the Town to apply for more grant money, particularly the EPA money, for nearly $126,000, by November 15th. Council authorization would be required to apply for the additional EPA money which required a one to one match, which was covered by things the Town had done. Mr. Utt asked if Council wished to proceed not knowing the status of the DCR funds ($100,000). Mr. Dawson asked if the $50,000 payment from the utility funds would still pay for work or had that been taken out. Mr. Utt responded that he expected to still do the work, but he understood that right now the Town did not have the personnel. Mr. Goodman asked if the Town grant writer had been consulted to see what other options were. Mr. Utt replied that she had been contacted and that other foundations for potential funding were available, such as the Pepsi Foundation, the Coca Cola Foundation, the Walmart Foundation, and two additional private foundations from Eastern Virginia. The biggest question, Mr. Utt concluded was whether or not to apply for additional grant funds. Mr. East asked if things did not come together, what would happen. Mr. Utt said the options were stop the project or take $100,000 from reserves. He felt that with the funding in place, the Town was close to getting a basketball court built as a phase. This could be a stopping point for either regrouping or to make sure that other funds were set up. Mr. Utt added that he had not asked DEQ about phasing for the skate park. DEQ was not focused on the skate park but on that section of the entire site where contaminants were located. He ventured that DEQ funding might not be needed if other sources for the funding gap were found. Mr. Radcliffe urged Council to use caution in spending money for the skate park/basketball court and that the Town needed to take care of what it already had. His concerns noted the Town's lack of staff and funding and the parks failure to pass the Americans with Disability Act standards. Despite these outstanding concerns an additional park was under consideration. He urged that Council not neglect what the Town already had and that a plan was needed. Mr. East said given the comments, he reminded Council that if risks were not taken then nothing happens. He agreed with Mr. Radcliffe on exercising caution while maintaining existing assets. He added that Council needed to be careful but that he was not opposed to making things happen. Mr. Goodman agreed on maintaining the park facilities, but noted a deficit in skate boarding and basketball facilities. He felt the Town should pursue grants while having a backup plan in place. He suggested a backup plan may consist of a basketball court and some green space. Then the Town could explore funding options for the skate park without going into reserves. A basketball court he ventured was easy to maintain and was greatly needed. He did not want to step back from the project as a whole, but would rather refocus on a new plan. Mr. East agreed with a phased approach to move forward as it made financial sense. Mr. Dawson noted Mr. Utt's request to move forward to get more funding and asked what was the harm in asking for more money. Mr. Utt replied that the grant matches were dollar for dollar. With the current $240,000 grant, the Town was able to meet the match using the value of the property, work that was done, and other things, not necessarily cash. For additional grants, the town would need to figure out how to match what was applied for. Mr. East asked what the Town's investment would be in a worst-case scenario. Mr. Utt responded that the investment would be $320,000 with a project total value of $770,000. Mr. Goodman asked if the fall back was to a basketball court and green space with no amenities, what would be the cost to the Town. Mr. Utt said most of that work was eligible for the grant funds which would be spent. This would result in a Town expenditure of Page 6 of 9/November 6, 2018 $17,000. Mr. Utt added that in conversations with DEQ, if additional grant funds were applied for and the Council went to the fall -back position, it was not the "end of the world" because the Town still had $240,000 in grant funds available. Mr. Goodman asked what action was needed from Council. Mr. Utt said he needed authorization to apply to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Brownsfield Remediation Fund for $106,400. Mr. Goodman moved that Council authorize staff to prepare the necessary paperwork to apply to the DEQ Brownsfield Remediation Fund for up to $106,400 for the park grant. Mr. Clontz seconded the motion which was approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye Council then moved on to New Business. 13. New Business a. Town Committee Vacancy Status Update Mr. Utt briefed Council on committee vacancies. The Cemetery Board, had two vacancies due to the retirement of two longstanding members. The Architecture Review Board vacancy for a professional member required a search outside of the Town for a candidate, since Town residency was not required. A recommendation on action to Council concerning seats on the Board of Zoning Appeals and the Planning Commission would be made later in the meeting. Mr. Utt noted the Housing Authority had one vacancy and urged that a "strong" member be added, since the Town would be relying on the Authority for the Downtown Project and the Redevelopment Incentive. Mr. Goodman asked how often the Cemetery Board met and was told that it met as needed. Mr. Utt said he approached Ms. Carter of the Cemetery Board about finding someone to fill a position. In the past, there were two representatives for Oakwood and one for Pinehurst. He suggested that there be two representatives for each area, making three seats open. In addition, Mr. Utt reported that appointments were needed to the Agency on Aging for a one year term. He recommended reappointing Lydia Hickam as the representative, with Gary Hancock as the alternate since they had served several years in that capacity. With respect to Mayoral appointments, the Mayor served co -terminus on the Pulaski Telecommunications Committee and as liaison to the Virginia Municipal League. Mr. Goodman said he did not remember the Mayor being appointed and suggested that a list of committees be prepared showing where the Mayor served co -terminus. Mr. East moved that Council direct staff to prepare the necessary paperwork to appoint Mr. Danny Underwood to a five year term ending November 5, 2023 on the Board of Zoning Appeals. The motion was seconded by Mr. Penn and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye Mr. Goodman then moved that Council reappoint Lydia Hickam as a voting member and Gary Hancock as the alternate to the NRV Agency on Aging for a one year term effective October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019. The motion was seconded by Mr. East and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye Page 7 of 9/November 6, 2018 Regarding Mayoral appointments, Mr. Utt said staff would get that information together for the work session. b. Resolution 2018-36, Planning Commission Appointments. Mr. Utt said this was a follow-up to the interviews conducted last week with two candidates for vacancies on the Planning Commission. The two new appointees were Chris Conner and Janet Jonas, while Terry Hale and Melissa Thomas were reappointments to the Commission. Mr. Dawson moved to approve Resolution 2018-36, A Resolution Appointing Citizens to the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Penn and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye Next item considered was a request for a joint public hearing for a special exception application. c. Request for Joint Public Hearing on Special Exception Application Mr. Utt informed Council that the Town had received a request from Pulaski Medical at 1006 East Main Street for a special exception to enlarge their facility. The applicant had secured extra space from the owner and a building permit, which was issued prematurely by the Town. For a non -conforming use however, a special exception was required. The goal was to have a joint public hearing by the Planning Commission and Town Council on December 4th, which offered the advantage of both bodies hearing the same information and answers to questions at the same time. Mr. Utt recommended that a joint public hearing be scheduled for December 4th Mr. East moved that Council direct staff do to all the necessary publications regarding a joint public hearing on a special exception application for Pulaski Medical on December 4, 2018. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion which was approved by the following roll call vote Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye 14. Closed Session Mayor Clark then requested a motion to enter Closed Session for three items: one item under Va. Code 2.2- 3711 (A) 1, a personnel matter regarding the Town's Organizational Chart; one item under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 3, discussion or consideration of acquisition of real property or disposal of public property concerning West Main Street properties; and, one item under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 7, consultation with legal counsel regarding actual or probable litigation regarding a zoning violation. Mr. Goodman asked what conversation on the Organizational Chart made it appropriate for a closed session. Mr. Utt replied it was specific to the creation or elimination of positions. Mr. Goodman then moved to enter Closed Session for the three referenced issues. His motion was seconded by Mr. East and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye Council entered Closed Session at 8:23 p.m. and returned from Closed Session at 9:18 p.m. Mayor Clark asked for a certification moJon that Council only discussed those three items for which it went into Closed Session: one item under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 1, a personnel matter regarding the Town's Page 8 of 9/November 6, 2018 Organizational Chart; one item under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 3, discussion or consideration of acquisition of real property or disposal of public property concerning West Main Street properties; and, one item under Va. Code 2.2-3711 (A) 7, consultation with legal counsel regarding actual or probable litigation regarding a zoning violation. Mr. Goodman made the certification motion, which was seconded by Mr. East and approved on the following roll call vote: Lane R. Penn -Aye Joseph K. Goodman -Aye Brooks R. Dawson -Aye G. Tyler Clontz -Aye Gregory C. East -Aye James A. Radcliffe -Aye 15. Reminder of Future Council Meetings and Adjournment. Mayor Clark reminded Council of the work session on November 20th at 5:00 p.m. and the budget work session on November 27th at 6:00 p.m. There being no further business, Mayor Clark then requested a motion to adjourn. The motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Goodman, seconded by Mr. Clontz and approved by the unanimous voice vote of Council at 9:21 p.m. ATTEST: David N. Quesenberry Clerk of Council 1 Approved:`` avid L. Clark Mayor Page 9 of 9/November 6, 2018