Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-19-26Town Council Meeting Minutes May 19, 2026 I. The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and asked for a roll call. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Steven W. Erickson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 2. Modification to Closed Session- No modifications were made. Mayor Collins- Aye 3. The Mayor asked for a motion to enter into Closed Session to discuss the following items: a. VA Code 2.2-3711 (A) 1 (1 item): Personnel i. Town Manager b. VA Code 2.2-3711 (A) 8 (1 item): Consultation with Legal Counsel i. Horner Acre Farms LLC The motion was made by Councilwoman Cope and seconded by Vice -Mayor Dawson Jeremy L. Clark- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Mayor Collins- Aye ' I Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Steven W. Erickson- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye The following council members and staff entered into Closed Session: Councilman Clark, Councilwoman Cope, Vice -Mayor Dawson, Councilman Erickson, Councilman Burchett, Mayor Collins, Town Manager, Todd Day, Town Attorney, Andrew McBride, and Clerk of Council, Ms. Hale. Nathan Smythers joined the Closed Session for the Consultation with Legal Counsel discussion. Both Mr. Smythers and Ms. Hale exited Closed Session before the personnel discussion. 7:03 p.m. Open Session 4. Certification of Closed Session- The Mayor asked for a motion to certify that only the following items were discussed during Closed Session: a. VA Code 2.2-3711 (A) 1 (1 item): Personnel i. Town Manager b. VA Code 2.2-3711 (A) 8 (1 item): Consultation with Legal Counsel i. Horner Acre Farms LLC G he motion was made by Councilman Clark and seconded by Councilwoman Cope. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Steven W. Erickson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 5. Councilman Clark led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. 6. Councilwoman Cope gave the invocation. Mayor Collins- Aye 7. Mayor Collins welcomed all in attendance and those viewing online. 8. Modification to Public Session- The Mayor asked for a motion to make two modifications. First, agenda item 6, "Organizational Contributions," and item7, the "AmeriCorps/ Parks and Trails Update," would be switched in the presentation order. Second, an additional discussion item was also added under section C. The added item was to set a public hearing date for a rezoning request to rezone property at 2321 Pleasant Hill Drive from R1 to RR, along with a zoning ordinance amendment to sections 4.1 and 5.3. The motion was made by Vice -Mayor Dawson and seconded by Councilman Clark to approve the modifications. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Mayor Collins- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Steven W. Erickson- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 9. Presentations a. AmeriCorps/ Parks & Trails Update- Nate Repass, Town of Pulaski Parks & Trails Manager Mr. Repass explained that the presentation would occur in two parts, beginning with recognition of the AmeriCorps team currently serving in the local community. He described how the process to bring the team to the area began the previous year and involved collaboration among numerous local partners. As a result of those efforts, the community successfully hosted another AmeriCorps team this year. The team, identified as "AmeriCorps Grizzly 7," was introduced individually. Team leader Jack Hagan was recognized, along with members Margaret April, who could not attend, Keymarie Beard, Dan Gonzalez, Bella Healy, Steph Maar, Drake Reed, Jayson Stallings, and Sebastian Ware. Mr. Repass highlighted the extensive accomplishments of the group during their service in the region. Their environmental cleanup work included removing nearly three tons of litter, collecting 220 tires, and filling two additional dumpsters with debris from the Peak Creek watershed, which supplies the community's drinking water. Beyond litter removal, the team completed trail maintenance and repairs on the Draper Mountain trails, removed invasive plant species along the Dora Trail, conducted a deep cleaning of the historic train depot, built birdhouses for the Friends of Peak Creek Bluebird Trail, and created fishing line recycling containers in partnership with the Friends of Claytor Lake. The AmeriCorps members also supported a wide range of local organizations and events. They assisted during the recent Music and Merchants event and collaborated with organizations including the Radford Transportation Museum, Pulaski Theatre, Calfee Community and Cultural Center, Pulaski County Emergency Management, Aldersgate United Methodist Church, Wilderness Road Regional Museum, and Camp Powhatan Scout Reservation. In addition to their work in Pulaski County, the team also spent several weeks assisting in Montgomery County with Virginia Tech's Big Plant event and waterway cleanup efforts. Mr. Repass explained that the team's stay in the area was made possible through partnerships with Friends of Peak Creek, the New River Conservancy, Pulaski County Emergency Management, and Aldersgate Methodist Church, which provided housing accommodations. Special recognition was given to Friends of Peak Creek Board President, Kathy Hanks, for coordinating much of the project, as well as county staff members, Laura Walters, Brad Wright, and Brian Talbert, for assisting with litter disposal logistics. Mr. Repass emphasized that while many individuals and organizations contributed to the project's success, the AmeriCorps members themselves were the most important part of the effort. Mayor Collins was then invited forward to present the team with a certificate of appreciation. Mayor Collins thanked the AmeriCorps volunteers for their service, noting that the town had also hosted AmeriCorps volunteers the previous year. He expressed appreciation for all the work the team had done to help make the town even more beautiful. After receiving the recognition, Team leader, Jack Hagan, briefly addressed the council and audience, thanking the town for hosting them and stating that they had enjoyed their time helping in the community. 1 Mr. Repass then transitioned into the second portion of his presentation, providing updates on current and upcoming projects throughout the town's parks system. He announced a targeted grand opening of the splash pad facility within a week, once weather conditions improved. Depending on the weather, a limited soft opening might occur over the upcoming weekend. Restroom facilities at both Cool Springs and the train station had reopened for the season and were operating daily from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Minor winter -related repairs had been completed, including replacement of a freeze -damaged faucet. The Draper Mountain Trails project continued progressing through work funded by the Virginia Outdoor Foundation Preservation Trust Fund grant. An Eagle Scout, Caleb Gardner -Young, had completed trail feature replacements and double -track improvements. During property surveying efforts, staff discovered a neighboring property encroachment involving approximately half an acre where a driveway crossed onto town property. The town was working through the process of separating and potentially selling that small section to the adjoining landowner, with additional details expected later in the summer. The town also obtained quotes from Shelton's Tree and Landscape Maintenance to replace a deteriorating 30-foot wooden wall feature on the trails. The original rough -cut lumber installation, completed approximately 10 to 15 years earlier, had deteriorated faster than desired. Staff was also continuing efforts to hire a contractor to develop a comprehensive trail plan for the facility. At the historic train depot, new flowers had just been planted that evening. The local garden club, Hoe and Hope, donated seedlings they had grown from seed, while Poor Boy's Produce donated additional plants. The town contributed soil, water, and labor. Work on restoring the caboose was also scheduled to begin soon, although persistent rain had delayed sandblasting and painting plans. Mr. Repass highlighted the recent replacement of the bridge at the end of Kiwanis Park on the Dora Trail. He credited the town's Public Works Department and General Properties Department, led by Chance Sadler, for completing the work. After discovering the structure was in worse condition than expected, crews replaced everything except the metal I -beams over a three-day period, installing treated lumber intended to provide long-term durability. At Heritage Park, shelter reservations had increased significantly compared to the previous year, with 18 reservations already booked early in the season. The bike park continued recovering from flood damage sustained the previous spring. Temporary maintenance had preserved safety, while the town continued coordinating with FEMA and the Virginia Department of Emergency 1 Management to restore lower trail surfaces and dirt pathing through the original contractor. Updates were also provided for 6tn Street Park, where trees from a prior tree - planting project had been installed. The town recently received quotes to repaint basketball court lines and was considering adding additional pickleball courts within the next year. The Beautification Committee had already completed several volunteer projects, including cleanup work at Counts Crossing Pocket Park, maintenance of bio-beds, and beautification work along Main Street. Additional volunteer projects were planned involving painting shelters and gazebos, weeding gardens, and other labor-intensive maintenance tasks. Mr. Repass concluded with updates on community events. He reported that the recent Music and Merchants event had been a strong success, featuring favorable weather, live music, 20 to 30 craft vendors, food trucks, and increased activity for local businesses along Main Street. Attendance was estimated to be at least equal to or greater than the previous year, although official attendance figures were still being finalized using police estimates and county data analysis tools. Finally, he announced that the Marketplace would begin the following Tuesday at the train station. Due to delays with the new facility, organizers decided to keep the marketplace at the train station for the entire season to avoid confusion caused by a mid -season relocation. He explained that the marketplace would take place every Tuesday throughout the summer from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The event would feature live bands, craft vendors, and a variety of other attractions intended to draw residents and visitors downtown. He then discussed the return of the town's summer car shows, which would occur on the third Saturday of each month at Jackson Park. The first event was scheduled for June 20th and would feature a "four-by-four takeover" theme, encouraging owners of four -wheel -drive vehicles to participate and display their vehicles. He noted that the previous themed event had focused on electric vehicles and explained that future shows would continue rotating through different themes. While the traditional "People's Choice" award would remain, organizers also planned to introduce themed awards tailored to each month's featured category to encourage repeat participation and attract different crowds throughout the summer. Additional downtown programming was also announced through the Pulaski On Main nonprofit organization. The town would support a series of "Rock the Block" events on Main Street, scheduled for Friday evenings beginning June 1 12th, with additional dates planned for July 17th and August 14th. During these events, Main Street would be closed from Washington Street to Jefferson Street in a manner similar to the Music and Merchants festival. The concept was described as a smaller -scale block party intended to create a safe, pedestrian -friendly atmosphere where activities such as skateboarding and social gatherings could occur without interference from traffic. Organizers hoped to feature live music, smaller activities, and sponsorships from community organizations. Residents were encouraged to monitor the town's social media channels and calendars for additional details as the events approached. Mr. Repass then described plans for the upcoming Fourth of July celebration. Traditionally, the Fourth of July parade alternated annually between the Town of Pulaski and the Town of Dublin. However, because of the upcoming 250th anniversary celebrations, the two localities decided to partner together for this year's event. The combined parade would be held in Pulaski near Jackson Park, with a targeted schedule of Friday, July 3rd at 3:00 p.m. for the parade, followed by a park celebration from approximately 4:00 to 7:00 p.m. Afterward, attendees would be able to travel to Calfee Park to watch fireworks. Organizers intentionally selected the July 3rd schedule to leave July 4th itself open for families and other community events. Mr. Repass also mentioned several related regional activities planned for July 4th itself, including Dublin's annual flag -raising ceremony, the county's courthouse celebration, and possible programming at local museums. He emphasized that organizers hoped the collaboration between Pulaski and Dublin would create a large regional celebration centered around Jackson Park. Looking ahead to later in the year, the town planned to continue supporting the Fine Arts Center's "Rhythm by the Rails" event on August 8th in Jackson Park. The event was expected to include live bands, food trucks, and vendors, similar to previous years. He also announced a new event debuting in September: The Town of Pulaski Chili Cook -Off. Tentatively scheduled for September 12th at Jackson Park, the event would feature chili competitions, public voting, and judged categories. He joked that town council members or the town manager might serve as judges and that organizers would seek participants who enjoyed spicy foods to help evaluate entries. The goal was to create a fun kickoff event for the fall season. Mr. Repass concluded by noting that additional fall events would also be announced later and reiterated that updates and detailed schedules for all events would continue to be shared through the town's Facebook page and official town calendar. 1 Vice -Mayor Dawson remarked that Mr. Repass appeared extremely busy and praised the extensive schedule of summer events and noted that the combination of business activity, downtown improvements, and Main Street enhancements would make the summer especially beneficial for the community. Mr. Repass responded that the goal was to keep residents and visitors engaged and enjoying activities throughout the season. 10. Organization Contributions Budgeted for FY 2025-2026 a. Pulaski Free Clinic- Melissa Adams -Felts, Pulaski Free Clinic Executive Director Ms. Adams -Felts began by explaining that the Pulaski Free Clinic had been located in downtown Pulaski since 1984, when concerned citizens established the organization to provide healthcare services to uninsured residents. For more than forty years, the clinic had served as a healthcare safety net for uninsured and low- income adults throughout the community, regardless of employment status. She emphasized that approximately 70 percent of the clinic's patients reside in the Town of Pulaski and explained that the clinic helps residents access healthcare services, medication assistance, and informed medical guidance that often prevents chronic illness and worsening health conditions. The clinic's mission, she stated, is to provide healthcare services to low-income uninsured adults in both the town and county. Patients are screened for eligibility and must fall at or below 300 percent of the federal poverty level for their household, although she stressed that no one is ever turned away for care. The executive director described the clinic's staffing structure, which includes a part-time physician, a physician assistant, two part-time nurse practitioners, two part-time office workers, one full-time nurse, and herself as executive director. She then outlined planned expansions expected during the summer of 2026. These included extended clinic hours with evening availability for working residents unable to attend daytime appointments, the addition of more physicians, expanded educational programming, and the creation of a pharmacy and a healthy food bank. She described the clinic's broader vision of becoming a community resource center capable of addressing other social and economic issues that affect public health. Ms. Adams -Felts explained that the clinic works diligently to keep operating costs low while continuing to provide quality care. She stated that unrestricted contributions from the Town of Pulaski directly support the clinic's ability to remain operational and continue serving uninsured residents. Other major contributors include the Pulaski County Board of Supervisors, the Virginia General Assembly through the Virginia Association of Free and Charitable 1 Clinics, the C.E. Richardson Foundation, and numerous churches, individuals, and institutions. She reported that the clinic had provided more than $1 million worth of medical services during fiscal year 2024-2025 and anticipated that total to increase by the end of the fiscal year. She further explained that each dollar contributed to the clinic translated into approximately six dollars' worth of medical services through the work of the clinic's staff and volunteers. The presentation also focused on growing healthcare challenges caused by inflation, economic hardship, and changing insurance coverage. Ms. Adams -Felts warned that these factors were expected to create a significant increase in uninsured and underinsured residents seeking assistance. She noted that the clinic serves as a crucial safety net by helping patients avoid costly hospital visits, medical debt, and worsening health outcomes. With previous unrestricted town funding, the clinic had been able to provide more than $86,000 in medical care specifically to Town of Pulaski residents. Due to anticipated changes in state and federal healthcare coverage, the clinic projected that demand for services could rise by as much as 20 percent or more. She cautioned that without continued support from the town, the clinic might be forced to reduce operating hours or eliminate one of its nurse practitioner positions. Ms. Adams -Felts also highlighted the clinic's extensive partnerships with organizations such as the Health Department, Rise Above Program, New River Community Services, Department of Social Services, VCOM, Radford University School of Nursing, New River Community College, local emergency rooms, and area churches. She stressed that the clinic contributes positively to the local workforce by helping residents remain healthy enough to continue working and reduce absenteeism. Ms. Adams -Felts formally requested $6,500 in funding from the Town of Pulaski for the upcoming fiscal year. She explained that the funding would support general operating expenses, including personnel costs, locally purchased medications through Martin's Pharmacy, medical supplies, utilities, and other basic operational needs required to keep the clinic functioning. She concluded by stating that just as it takes a village to raise a child, it also takes cooperation between the town and county to care for uninsured residents. She thanked the council for its past support and invited members to visit the clinic to observe its work firsthand. Manager Day thanked Ms. Adams -Felts for her presentation and indicated that funding decisions would be communicated soon. He added that he had recently toured the facility and described the services provided there as phenomenal. He 1 commented that the clinic was one of Pulaski's "biggest secrets" because many residents may not realize the extent of healthcare services available through the organization. Manager Day also praised the clinic's staff for their work and stated that the organization had significant potential to expand its visibility and outreach throughout the town. He also complimented the clinic's success in persuading doctors and nurses to volunteer their time for the benefit of the community, calling the level of volunteer support remarkable. Ms. Adams -Felts responded by expressing gratitude for the volunteer physicians and nurses who contribute their time and services to the clinic. 1 1. Public Hearing a. Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Mayor Collins read the Proposed Budget for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2027 advertisement that ran in the Patriot on May 1 sc and May 8cn Following the reading of the notice, Mayor Collins requested a staff report on the proposed budget. Manager Day began by noting that he had not received any phone calls or emails from residents with questions about the budget proposal. He took time to recognize the extensive effort staff devoted to developing the budget, specifically praising the finance department and other personnel involved in the process. Manager Day described the proposed budget as a significant accomplishment because the town had now gone six consecutive years without increasing general revenue sources despite continued inflation and broader economic uncertainty. He emphasized that the budget contained no recommendations, studies, or proposals involving tax increases or fee increases within the general fund. He credited the town's strategic use of federal ARPA funds over the previous four years with helping the town avoid the need for additional taxes or fees while still maintaining services and investments. He also reviewed prior efforts to simplify the town's utility rate structures. Referring to the previous year's work on the water fund, he explained that the town had substantially reduced the number of rate brackets and fees in what he described as an overly complicated and outdated structure. Similar efforts had now been completed for the sewer fund. He stated that anticipated sewer -related increases that had once been projected at 25 percent over three consecutive years had been reduced to an average of roughly 19 to 20 percent, while sewer fund increases were averaging closer to 8 to 9 percent. Manager Day reported that the town had received correspondence that day from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and the Virginia Resources Authority regarding the interceptor project, confirming that the project would move forward. He stated that the associated debt service payments had already been locked in and incorporated into the town's financial planning. He also noted that the town had approximately one more year remaining on both the water and sewer funding plans. Although he acknowledged that the budget was highly detailed and complicated, the Manager Day said he did not intend to spend extensive time dissecting every component during the public hearing. He explained that he had consulted with officials from Montgomery County, Christiansburg, Blacksburg, local constitutional officers, and Pulaski County's finance staff while developing assumptions for the budget. One of the major assumptions involved anticipated reassessment growth tied to six -year property reassessments. He stated that the budget was built conservatively using a 20 percent estimate, even though he believed future numbers could eventually approach 40 percent. By budgeting conservatively, the town would retain additional financial flexibility moving forward. Manager Day then reviewed major budget totals. The general fund revenues and expenditures were balanced at approximately $11.49 million. He also clarified that there had been misprints published regarding the water fund, and because of those errors, the water fund would be brought back separately for another public hearing at a future council meeting. Even so, he announced that the water fund total stood at approximately $4.16 million. The sewer fund totaled roughly $5.04 million, while the solid waste fund remained at approximately $848,000 with no proposed garbage rate increases. He noted that the solid waste operation was functioning positively financially under what he described as a five-year plan. Concluding his remarks, Manager Day again thanked staff members, engineers, and department personnel for the extensive effort devoted to preparing the budget. He reiterated that the town's conservative financial planning and ARPA funding had allowed the town to avoid raising taxes or fees while still maintaining flexibility and infrastructure investment. Before opening the public hearing, Mayor Collins informed attendees that citizens were welcome to speak and that a sign-up list had been prepared for public comments. He explained that council members would not directly respond to comments during the hearing but would consider all remarks before later voting on the proposed budget. Mayor Collins opened the Public Hearing. J Melinda Musick approached the podium and criticized of the proposed budget, arguing that the town should not maintain what she described as excessive or unlimited expenditures funded through taxpayer money. She stated that residents already paid extremely high levels of taxation through federal, state, county, and town governments and compared modern taxation levels to the grievances that led to the Boston Tea Party. Ms. Musick specifically objected to what she described as "loose" or overly broad line items in the budget labeled as miscellaneous expenditures or miscellaneous income. She argued that such categories lacked accountability and could allow inappropriate or poorly defined spending. Comparing miscellaneous funds to petty cash in a business, she said that taxpayers deserved greater specificity and oversight regarding how public funds were spent. Her comments then shifted away from the municipal budget toward broader political and ideological concerns. She identified herself as a sovereign citizen and stated that she no longer intended to support government spending with her tax dollars because of what she described as government involvement in genocide. She also referenced opposition to proposed data centers, claiming they would negatively affect local water resources because of water-cooling systems. Ms. Musick further discussed her views regarding federal income taxes, asserting that income taxes were originally intended to be temporary during World War I. She then presented printed materials to council members that she claimed were evidence relating to accusations involving national political figures. During this portion of her remarks, she referenced various public officials and alleged misconduct, encouraging residents to stop financially supporting the federal government and to file exempt status forms with employers as a protest measure. Ms. Musick briefly continued emphasizing that she had provided what she believed to be evidence supporting her concerns before returning to her seat. Eric Tyler began his comments by questioning why the proposed budget appeared to reduce funding for the police department while increasing funding elsewhere. He expressed concern that reducing police resources could negatively affect public safety and argued that residents and potential visitors, including individuals associated with Virginia Tech, would want to feel secure in the community. Mr. Tyler stated that he had personal experience working at Virginia Tech and suggested that maintaining a strong police presence was important for attracting people and investment to the area. He argued that individuals considering relocating to Pulaski, including potential residents connected to Virginia Tech, would expect a community where they felt safe. Drawing on his own experience and conversations with others, he stated that many people shared similar concerns regarding safety and law enforcement staffing. Mr. Tyler noted that security personnel at Virginia Tech reportedly earned higher salaries than officers in the Town of Pulaski Police Department and described that situation as discouraging. He urged town officials to provide additional support and resources for the police department, including higher pay and the tools needed to address crime and drug activity within the community. He spoke positively about the town itself, describing Pulaski as a beautiful small Appalachian town that he had admired since childhood. He explained that he and his wife had chosen to move there because of their affection for the area and their desire to retire in the community. However, he said his wife remained fearful about safety issues, and he expressed frustration that residents paying taxes in a small town should feel unsafe in their own community. Mr. Tyler also expressed optimism about the town's future, referencing redevelopment efforts and hopes for additional jobs and economic growth. He encouraged council members to continue improving the town and specifically asked them to "give Chief Kelly a chance," complimenting the police chief and describing him as approachable and helpful in dealing with community concerns. He concluded by thanking the council for listening to his remarks. With no other speakers, Mayor Collins closed the Public Hearing. 12. Voting Items a. Resolution 2026-17 Re -Appointing Joseph Goodman to the Pulaski Redevelopment and Housing Authority for the Town of Pulaski, Virginia The motion was made by Councilwoman Cope and seconded by Councilman Clark to adopt Resolution 2026-17. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Mayor Collins- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Steven W. Erickson- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 13. Discussion(s) a. Temporary Housing Definition- Manager Day Manager Day introduced the topic by reading correspondence from Nathan Smithers, the town's zoning and building official. He explained that at a Planning Commission meeting held on March 9, 2026, commissioners determined that the town's zoning ordinance lacked a formal definition for temporary housing shelters. As a result, the commission recommended creating a new definition and forwarding it to the Town Council for consideration. The proposed definition described a temporary housing shelter as a facility providing short-term residential accommodations for individuals or families experiencing homelessness or housing instability, along with supportive services specified through the special exception approval process. The proposal stated that such facilities would generally operate continuously but would limit occupancy to a maximum of 120 days between November 1 st and February 28th. According to the letter, the purpose of the definition was to clarify how such facilities would be regulated within the zoning ordinance and ensure that any supportive services would be specifically identified and approved through the special exception process. The proposal would place the definition within Chapter 11 of the zoning ordinance and would permit temporary housing shelters only through special exception approvals in designated zoning districts, including RI, R2, R3, R0, B1, B2, and B3. Manager Day noted that the Planning Commission had voted unanimously, 5-0, in favor of recommending the amendment to the council. He further explained that additional legal drafting work would still be required before the ordinance could become fully operational. Because that drafting process would involve legal expenses and more detailed language prepared by town attorneys, he wanted to confirm that the council generally supported moving forward before directing staff and legal counsel to proceed. Councilman Burchett then voiced strong opposition to the proposal, arguing that it represented "a step in the wrong direction." While acknowledging the sincere intentions of those seeking to help less fortunate individuals, he expressed concern that allowing temporary shelters in residential areas would negatively affect nearby homeowners and property values. He stated that residents had already communicated opposition to him and pointed to examples from other cities, including Roanoke and Asheville, North Carolina, where he claimed homeless -related facilities had contributed to increased loitering, discarded needles, and negative impacts on surrounding businesses. Councilman Burchett specifically referenced a recent situation in Roanoke involving a facility that included lockers and related services, asserting that surrounding sidewalks and businesses experienced problems afterward. He also 1 encouraged others to read a New York Post article about Asheville's downtown business climate, arguing that facilities serving unhoused populations sometimes led to loitering and harm to local businesses. He concluded by reiterating his opposition to the proposal, stating that he did not believe it would benefit the town, neighboring property owners, or local businesses. Councilwoman Cope then asked for clarification regarding the "special exception" language, confirming that facilities would not simply be permitted automatically "by right" but instead would require a separate approval process. Manager Day responded that this was correct and explained that the ordinance still required more precise legal drafting to fully define how the special exception process would operate. Vice -Mayor Dawson stated that he agreed substantially with the concerns already raised. He emphasized the need to carefully consider the interests of business owners, property owners, investors, and future economic development efforts. While expressing compassion for individuals in need, he argued that the council had a responsibility to balance the interests of the entire community. He maintained that the proposed shelter definition was not the appropriate path forward and reiterated that the town's primary responsibility was to maintain fair and stable conditions for the community as a whole. He clarified that his position did not oppose charitable acts or helping people individually. He said churches and citizens should absolutely continue feeding, clothing, and assisting people in need. However, he believed introducing homeless shelters into residential or commercial districts could negatively affect the town's long-term success and investment climate. He also pointed to the many organizations already working to help vulnerable populations through existing services and outreach programs, stating that the community was already doing a strong job supporting people while still maintaining accountability. Councilman Erickson responded by arguing that the proposed definition was actually intended to support those churches and organizations already attempting to help unhoused individuals. He explained that because the zoning ordinance currently lacked a definition, churches or organizations attempting to provide temporary shelter could potentially violate zoning regulations. In his view, the amendment would simply create a legal framework allowing those groups to continue helping people without violating town ordinances. He emphasized that many unhoused individuals were already local residents and not outsiders coming into the community. Some, he explained, were employed full-time but unable to secure housing because of limited housing availability and 1 1 voucher shortages. He noted that residents might personally know people experiencing housing instability without realizing it. Councilman Erickson also criticized the proposal's 120-day operational limitation, arguing that cold weather frequently extended beyond February. He expressed concern that restricting shelter operations to November through February suggested the community only cared about vulnerable individuals during the winter months. While agreeing that the town did not need a large-scale mission operation like those seen in larger cities, he argued that churches and nonprofits should still be allowed to provide shelter and assistance on their own time and at their own expense. He stressed that these organizations were not requesting town funding but simply seeking permission to help those in need without violating zoning regulations. He concluded by stating that individuals who did not personally wish to participate in such efforts did not have to do so, but the town should not prevent willing organizations from helping others. He reiterated that the 120-day limit remained one of his primary concerns. Toward the end of the discussion, Councilwoman Cope asked about the details of the churches' specific operational plans. Manager Day responded that he did not have the complete plan in front of him but explained that the zoning proposal had been written specifically in response to requests from churches and that the listed zoning districts had been carefully selected. He reiterated that the issue initially arose because the town's zoning ordinance did not currently contain a definition for temporary housing shelters. Councilman Clark continued discussing the proposed zoning definition for temporary housing shelters. It was clarified that the purpose of the ordinance amendment was primarily to create a formal definition within the zoning code so that churches or organizations seeking to provide temporary shelter services would have a legal pathway to do so through the special exception process. Manager Day explained that organizations would still need to present detailed plans before the Planning Commission and ultimately the Town Council before any approval could be granted. Manager Day noted that local churches and organizations had reportedly been working on these ideas for several years and that the proposed zoning amendment was intended to help them move forward legally. However, he acknowledged that he could not answer every operational detail because the proposal was still in an early drafting stage. 1 1 Additional clarification was provided regarding the town's current practices. Vice -Mayor Dawson explained that the town already permits emergency shelters during severe weather events under specific emergency guidelines. Those emergency shelter allowances are temporary and tied directly to dangerous weather conditions. He emphasized that the new proposal differed significantly because it would permit shelters to operate continuously from November 1 through February 28, regardless of weather emergencies. He stressed that this represented a substantial policy shift rather than a continuation of existing emergency practices. Councilman Burchett's discussion then focused on concerns about public safety and neighborhood impacts. He described speaking with a resident who allegedly found discarded needles in her backyard and experienced people cutting through her property near a currently operating facility. He questioned how the town could justify approving additional shelter -related uses if residents already felt unsafe or unable to allow their children to play outside comfortably. Manager Day clarified again that the immediate action before the council was not final approval of a shelter ordinance, but rather authorization for town attorneys to draft formal legal language that could later return to the Planning Commission and Town Council for further review and public hearings. Mayor Collins then summarized the procedural step under consideration, emphasizing that the vote would only move the proposal forward into a formal draft for additional review rather than enact the ordinance itself. The motion was made by Councilman Clark and seconded by Councilman Erickson to direct the town attorney to prepare formal ordinance language regarding the temporary housing shelter definition and special exception process. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Nay G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Steven W. Erickson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Nay Mayor Collins- Aye b. New Virginia Laws- Andrew McBride, Town Attorney, Farthing Legal, PC Mr. McBride stated that lawmakers introduced more than 3,600 pieces of legislation during the session, with approximately 1,100 bills ultimately enacted. He also noted that the state budget had not yet passed and would instead be addressed during a special legislative session. Mr. McBride began by reviewing legislation related to planning and zoning. He explained that House Bill 655 requires localities to allow manufactured housing in 1 any zoning district where site -built homes are permitted, provided certain conditions are met. Those conditions include converting the manufactured home into real estate by permanently attaching it to land, ensuring the unit is less than five years old, and limiting properties to one manufactured home per lot. He clarified that the law does not authorize mobile home parks in all districts but instead allows individual manufactured homes under specified circumstances. He then discussed Senate Bill 531 regarding accessory dwelling units (ADUs), commonly referred to as in-law suites or small secondary homes associated with a primary residence. Under the new law, single-family zoning districts must permit ADUs through a local permitting process. Localities may charge up to $500 for processing permits and can impose restrictions related to size and placement, but they may not prohibit ADUs outright. Vice -Mayor Dawson asked whether ADUs could be restricted to certain zoning districts, and Mr. McBride responded that his interpretation of the law was that any area allowing single-family homes must also allow ADUs. Further discussion clarified that ADUs must remain relatively close to the primary residence. Mr. McBride used examples such as pool houses or mother-in-law suites to explain the concept. Mr. McBride next reviewed Senate Bill 94 concerning data centers. The legislation requires special site assessments addressing sound impacts and potentially other environmental or operational concerns before approval of data center developments. He also explained House Bill 711 regarding solar energy facilities. Under the law, ground -mounted solar projects must now be reviewed through a special exception process in agricultural, commercial, industrial, and mixed -use zoning districts. Local governments are permitted to impose conditions related to setbacks, fencing, and visual impacts. Additionally, localities must report the outcomes of solar project applications to the State Corporation Commission. The presentation then shifted to affordable housing legislation, which Mr. McBride described as a major priority during the legislative session. House Bill 806 now allows Industrial Development Authorities (IDAs) and Economic Development Authorities (EDAs) to participate in single-family and multi -family housing development projects even in localities that already have housing authorities. Previously, those powers were more restricted. Another bill, House Bill 352, authorizes localities to create grant programs supporting affordable housing initiatives through IDAs. Mr. McBride also discussed Senate Bill 388, which allows tax-exempt religious and nonprofit organizations greater flexibility to construct mixed -use or residential housing developments in ways that partially preempt local zoning restrictions. He emphasized that the law does not take effect until January 1, 2027, and will sunset in 2031. Organizations must also have owned the property for at least five years before using the law's provisions, preventing speculative land purchases solely for development purposes. Additional affordable housing legislation included measures designed to streamline zoning approvals for affordable housing projects, allow localities to establish rights of first refusal on affordable housing properties, and create real estate tax exemptions encouraging conversion of existing buildings into residential units. Mr. McBride concluded this portion of the presentation by briefly reviewing several law enforcement -related bills. He noted that immigration enforcement and cooperation with federal authorities had been a major political issue nationally and that several new Virginia bills addressed local cooperation with federal immigration officials, although he did not believe those changes would significantly affect current town operations. He also referenced House Bill 1482, which at the time had not yet been signed into law. That bill would place restrictions on the use of face coverings by law enforcement personnel. Mr. McBride stated that he did not foresee the measure causing operational problems for the town but wanted the council members to be aware of it. Mr. McBride continued his presentation on recently enacted Virginia legislation by discussing several additional public safety and government transparency measures. He explained that new legislation authorizes gun buyback programs for towns and requires counties to establish such programs. He also referenced Senate Bill 84 and related legislation expanding the use of cameras for traffic enforcement, noting that several bills addressed automated traffic violation enforcement during the most recent General Assembly session. Mr. McBride then reviewed Senate Bill 699 concerning the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Under the law, local governments are now required to post meeting agendas on their websites prior to meetings, and localities generally may not take final action on items that were not listed beforehand on the agenda. He clarified that the bill includes exceptions for ceremonial resolutions and procedural matters such as scheduling future hearings. Mr. McBride added that 1 the Town of Pulaski already substantially complies with these requirements, so he did not expect the law to significantly change town procedures. Mr. McBride next discussed House Bill 1263 concerning collective bargaining for local government employees. Although Governor Glenn Youngkin vetoed the bill and it therefore did not become law, Mr. McBride stated that he believed similar legislation would likely return in future sessions. He explained that current Virginia law makes collective bargaining at the local government level entirely optional. Under existing law, if municipal employees seek to unionize, local governments may choose whether or not to recognize and negotiate with the union. The proposed legislation would have fundamentally changed that structure by requiring local governments to collectively bargain with employees who successfully unionized. Mr. McBride noted that the proposed law contemplated a large supporting framework of regulations and oversight, including a Public Employee Relations Board. He added that the bill included several years of lead time before implementation to allow those systems to be created. Even though the legislation failed this session, he advised the council members to remain aware of the issue because it is likely to reappear in future legislative debates. Vice -Mayor Dawson asked whether recent changes allowing Industrial Development Authorities (IDAs) and Economic Development Authorities (EDAs) to participate in housing development could eliminate the need to maintain separate housing authority boards. Manager Day responded that the legislation potentially allows IDAs and EDAs to exercise powers similar to housing authorities in residential development matters, whereas previously they could not work on residential housing projects. He stated that he and the town attorneys would evaluate whether the boards now possess overlapping powers and whether consolidation might be feasible. Vice -Mayor Dawson noted that finding active volunteers for boards and commissions has sometimes been difficult over the years, though the Housing Authority had remained relatively strong and active. He suggested that combining boards could potentially strengthen local governance if no significant drawbacks existed. Manager Day indicated he had already discussed the possibility with several individuals even before the legislation passed. Mr. McBride cautioned, however, that the Housing Authority may still possess unique powers that IDAs and EDAs do not share, meaning the boards may not be fully redundant despite the new legislation. 1 The conversation then shifted to the manufactured housing legislation discussed earlier. Manager Day warned the council members that the law allowing manufactured housing "by right" in districts permitting site -built homes could create substantial controversy within the community. He stated that the town had historically maintained distinctions between manufactured housing and traditional site -built homes and expressed concern that the legislation could effectively permit single -wide or double -wide homes in all residential districts. Manager Day said the town would attempt to identify any possible legal loopholes or mechanisms to protect community interests while complying with the state law. c. Setting a Public Hearing Date The Council then considered scheduling two public hearings for July 7, 2026. The first hearing would address a proposed zoning ordinance amendment affecting Sections 4.1 and 5.3 of the zoning ordinance. The second hearing would consider rezoning property located at 2321 Pleasant Hill Drive from RI to RR zoning, contingent upon approval of the ordinance amendment. The motion was made by Councilman Clark and seconded by Councilwoman Cope to schedule both public hearings on July 7, 2026. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Mayor Collins- Aye Sunshine N. Cope- Aye Steven W. Erickson- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 14. Public Comment Period Terrie Sternberg spoke in support of temporary shelter efforts and stated that she originally attended the meeting to commend the AmeriCorps volunteers before hearing the council's discussion regarding homelessness and shelter definitions. Ms. Sternberg said she believed much of the public fear surrounding unhoused individuals stemmed from misunderstanding and unfamiliarity. Drawing from her personal experience assisting with emergency shelter operations over the past two winters, Ms. Sternberg stated that shelter guests generally complied with rules, arrived and departed on schedule, and did not abuse the facilities where they stayed. She argued that many of the social problems being discussed, including substance abuse and mental health challenges, already exist within the community regardless of whether temporary shelters operate. Ms. Sternberg encouraged the council members and residents to personally interact with unhoused individuals rather than fear them from a distance. She described many of the individuals as grateful, respectful people who could improve their lives if provided temporary stability and access to supportive services through organizations such as New River Valley Community Services and Rest and Rise. i �he further argued that failing to provide organized support systems only worsens existing mental health and substance abuse issues. Ms. Sternberg urged residents skeptical of shelters to speak with volunteers and workers familiar with the unhoused population to gain a more accurate understanding of the situation. Toward the end of her remarks, Ms. Sternberg referenced conversations with emergency management officials following a recent 17-night emergency shelter operation. She stated that emergency management personnel had indicated the current emergency shelter framework was not sustainable long-term and that churches and community groups would need a more permanent legal pathway if they were to continue assisting unhoused individuals effectively. 15. Consent Agenda a. Consideration of May 5, 2026 Town Council Minutes The motion was made by Councilwoman Cope and seconded by Councilman Clark to adopt the minutes as written. Jeremy L. Clark- Aye G. Tyler Clontz- Absent Mayor Collins- Aye Sunshine N. Cope -Aye Steven W. Erickson- Aye Brooks R. Dawson- Aye Joel B. Burchett- Aye 16. Council Comments & Board Updates Councilman Clark praised the recent Music and Merchants event, describing it as highly successful and encouraging residents to participate in upcoming downtown activities, including the Nightmare on Main haunted house attraction. He jokingly challenged Town Manager Todd Day to be among the first participants to go through the haunted attraction. Councilman Clark then delivered prepared remarks recognizing National Public Works Week. He emphasized the critical role public works employees play in maintaining roads, infrastructure, water systems, sanitation, and public spaces throughout the community. He noted that much of the work performed by public works staff often goes unnoticed despite affecting every resident, business, and visitor daily. He praised public works employees for their professionalism, dedication, and willingness tolrespond during severe weather events and infrastructure emergencies. Councilman Clark stressed that the town's quality of life depends heavily on the behind -the -scenes efforts of these workers and said National Public Works Week provides an important opportunity for the community to acknowledge and appreciate their service. Councilwoman Cope expressed appreciation for all town staff, including law enforcement and Public Works and noted that Public Works employees are often 17 residents' first point of contact when infrastructure or maintenance issues arise. She thanked all employees for their work and recognized the challenges of serving the public. Discussion then shifted to recent and upcoming community events. Councilwoman Cope praised the success of the recent Music and Merchants event, noting the strong turnout and positive photographs shared afterward. She encouraged residents to participate in the many upcoming summer activities planned throughout Pulaski, including the popular "Chrome in the Valley" event. Vice -Mayor Dawson discussed the importance of ensuring local businesses benefit from the growing number of community events attracting visitors into town. It was suggested that the town and organizations like Pulaski on Main continue finding ways to communicate event schedules and opportunities to business owners so they can maximize customer traffic during festivals and public gatherings. He asked whether businesses are allowed to temporarily operate on sidewalks during events to attract additional attention, suggesting that tasteful outdoor displays or temporary operations could help local merchants capitalize on increased foot traffic. The conversation also touched on recreational tourism, specifically bicycling and trail development. Vice -Mayor Dawson noted the absence of a bike repair business in town and suggested the community should actively pursue such a service, especially given the increased interest in trail and biking activities. The discussion concluded with more recognition for town employees and emergency personnel, with Vice -Mayor Dawson noting that appreciation for these workers extends beyond designated recognition weeks and is expressed regularly throughout the year. Councilman Erickson discussed the recently installed school zone traffic cameras near Critzer Elementary School. Questions were raised about whether the cameras were operated by the Town of Pulaski or Pulaski County. Manager Day clarified that the county oversees the program and requested permission to use the town's right-of-way for the installations. Concerns were raised about drivers entering the school zone from side streets who cannot see whether the flashing school -zone lights are active. Councilman Erickson noted that motorists could unintentionally receive expensive speeding citations without realizing the cameras were operational, referencing a recent ticket issued for driving only six miles per hour over the school -zone limit. Suggestions were made to explore additional flashing indicators or signage on side streets to better notify drivers when cameras are active. 1 1 n Burchett commended the town employees observed working downtown -ds and cleaning public areas, specifically naming several employees for ,sitive example through hands-on work in the community. The police also received praise for professionalism and positive interactions with le shared favorable experiences with younger officers and complimented the is overall performance. 11�Iayor Collins addressed earlier public comments suggesting the town was reducing support for law enforcement. He firmly stated that the council would not reduce support for the police department and emphasized the importance of maintaining public safety resources. He explained that some budget line items may have been removed simply because they were no longer needed, not because the council intended to weaken the department. Mayor Collins also shared an example of Public Works responding quickly to a citizen concern involving damaged concrete near a wheelchair -accessible ramp by his business. He described how Public Works repaired the area promptly after being notified, improving safety and accessibility for residents. He concluded by thanking all town employees for the extensive work they perform behind the scenes that residents often never see. 17. Manager's Report 7 Manager Day began his report by providing an update on the "177 Project." He emphasized that the project remains active and has not stalled, though much of the work currently involves legal coordination, surveying, and infrastructure analysis happening behind the scenes. He explained that the 177-acre property contains a significant amount of overhead and underground utilities that had not previously been identified, creating unexpected complexity and slowing progress. Manager Day stated that surveyors were working through final comments and revisions and said he hoped the project could advance more quickly once those issues were resolved. He noted that additional engineering and hydraulic studies would still be required, but reiterated that the project remains an active priority for the town. He also briefly referenced a recent potluck event organized for the police department. Manager Day continued his remarks by noting that the town would be holding another employee appreciation event later in the week for Public Works staff, similar to the re cent gathering held for the police department. He thanked Councilman Clark for his remarks recognizing Public Works employees, specifically referencing previous comments that had deeply resonated with staff members over the years. Manager Day emphasized the demanding nature of Public Works operations, explaining that employees work under all conditions, including extreme cold, heat, and emergency situations such as water leaks during freezing weather. He stated that the work never truly I tops for these employees and extended appreciation not only to Public Works but also to administrative staff and all town employees. He also praised the police department for the difficult work they perform and the professionalism they maintain despite operational challenges. Manager Day directly addressed concerns raised earlier during the public hearing regarding perceived reductions in the police department budget. He echoed the mayor's earlier comments and clarified that budget reductions reflected technical or administrative adjustments rather than cuts to essential law enforcement operations. He explained that some reductions were tied to staffing transitions and associated decreases in payroll -related expenses such as FICA contributions and insurance costs. He specifically referenced approximately $70,000 in reduced insurance expenses within the police department budget. Manager Day stressed that none of the reductions involved safety equipment, operational necessities, or diminished support for the police department. He firmly stated that the town remains committed to ensuring officers have the resources necessary to perform their duties effectively. Manager Day also reminded residents that he maintains an open-door policy and encouraged anyone with questions about the budget or the town's financial planning to contact him directly for clarification. 18. Reminder of Future Council Meeting a. June 2, 2026; Closed Session 6:00 p.m.; Open Session 7:00 p.m. 19 ith no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 8:43 p.m. AT ST - Adcj� Ol' C. Hale Clerk of Council 1 TOWN of PULASKI VIRGINIA W. Shannon Collins Mayor